FIRST HAWAIIAN BANK & BANK OF HAWAII VIOLATING FARA ACT & OTHER MAJOR LAWS
Executive Summary
This website presents a public record of our efforts to raise serious concerns about court process, agency coordination, privacy, and financial harm affecting "WE THE PEOPLE" and related trust and estate matters. Since beginning our reporting efforts, we have sought review of potential FARA, RICO, privacy, and retaliation issues, along with concerns involving DHS-CSEA, CPS, HPD, and banking institutions connected to the Hawaiian Kingdom context. We believe these issues require independent investigation, transparency, and lawful oversight by the appropriate public and private institutions.
Our position is that multiple systems may have acted in ways that affected protected rights, financial access, and due process. We are also asking for review of whether court and agency records, including CRIS-related tracking, were used in a manner that created improper monitoring, trade-out, or other harmful effects. This site is intended to document the concerns, preserve the timeline, and support accountability through lawful channels.
FARA ACT
We believe the conduct may warrant review under the Foreign Agents Registration Act if any person or organization was acting on behalf of a foreign principal without proper disclosure or registration. If proven, coordination with banks, courts, or agencies could support a claim that undisclosed foreign-influence activity affected financial or administrative decisions.
SECURITIES FRAUD
We believe the transactions and related record actions may have affected financial rights, account access, or asset handling in a way that warrants review for securities-related misconduct and other financial fraud. If any participant knowingly joined that conduct despite knowing it was unlawful, that fact would strengthen claims of coordinated wrongdoing.
RICO
We contend that the conduct of the involved agencies and institutions may form a pattern of coordinated wrongdoing affecting protected rights, finances, and due process. If proven, that pattern could support a civil RICO theory because it would show an enterprise, repeated acts, and continuing harm.
THE BANKS ARE NOW PART OF THE FARA & RICO CONSPIRACY WITH THE COURT AND BAR SYSTEM
THE CRIS SYSTEM IS USED WITH THE COURT SYSTEM AND BANKS TO TRANSACT INTERNATIONALLY
Experienced professionals dedicated to STEALING YOUR SILVER AND CREATING BONDS /SECURITIES WITHOUT YOUR PERMISSION OR ACKNOWLEDGEMENT.
Proven MATERIAL FACT :
ASK YOUR LOCAL BANKER WHERE IS THE CREDITOR TAB ON YOUR LIVING TRUST Binder? THE BANKS make themselves the creditor and you the debtor. ATTORNEY OF LAW is guilty of that because he is COMPROMISED to the banks, judges, other firms, state corp agencies (de facto) ; therefore,
THIS is a clear BREACH OF CONTRACT BECAUSE OF CONFLICT OF INTEREST involved and the outcome is not based on law but bias decision making!
WHY REPORT THEM FOR FARA : RICO
WE contend that the conduct of the involved agencies and institutions may form a pattern of coordinated wrongdoing affecting protected rights, finances, and due process. If proven, that pattern could support a civil RICO theory because it would show an enterprise, repeated acts, and continuing harm.
Experienced professionals dedicated to THE THEFT OF YOUR GENERATIONAL WEALTH
Proven MATERIAL FACTS.
EEON'S LAWSUIT THAT WE JOINED ABOVE
COURT IS IN DEFAULT (ALL BANKS OR BUSINESS DOING BANKING
REMEMBER : THE BANKS ARE IN COLUSION WITH THE BAR AGENTS (JUDGES/LAWYERS)
Why did we join the lawsuit? What did we receive from it, and how do we claim our credits?
This matter reflects a larger journey of learning how to challenge a system built on trickery, procedure, and process, and the steps required to reach a lawful result in any endeavor. These are principles that should have been taught to us in our youth, and it remains a shame that justice has not been served for more than 300 years.
In simple terms, the lawsuit was directed at the Federal Reserve and its governors for failing to return the promissory notes associated with our auto and mortgage loans after payment had been completed. This conduct represents trickery rooted in usury, and a legal structure was used to create a loophole through a biased bar system and a conspiracy among lawyers.
Every bank participates in the clearinghouse and BIS sections of banking, whether it is BMW of America, Bank of America, a mortgage lending institution, a credit agency, or even the state in which you live. The matter involves 400 billion, and I am claiming 500 million to one billion, depending on the needs of my foundations.
The way forward is to reclaim power through education and to reject the limitations of a broken educational system that does not teach banking, or the distinction between creditor and debtor. You may still join lawsuit because it is in default and the way he set up the plaintiff to be universal and that is all Americans / we are disenfranchised American Civilians that believe in peace and STAND BY THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA FOR AMERICA
